Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05080
Original file (BC 2013 05080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05080

	XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She had a medical condition during both contested FAs, which precluded her from obtaining a satisfactory overall ratings.

She went through an MEB a little over a year ago and should not have taken the run/walk portion of both of the FAs.

The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10, the applicant participated in the contested FAs and attained an unsatisfactory composite score.

IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13; any military member can appeal their Fitness Assessment through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error/injustice.
 
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FAs dated 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1. The application was timely filed.

2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted her application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that she has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting his application to the BCMR and the application will only be reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of administrative relief.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05080 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Oct 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXX
                                   Chair






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05484

    Original file (BC 2013 05484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 30 Jun 10. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00298

    Original file (BC 2014 00298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00298 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00368

    Original file (BC 2013 00368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00368 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Dec 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: IAW AFI 36-2905, dated 21...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01997

    Original file (BC 2014 01997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00736

    Original file (BC 2014 00736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition with his knee, which prevented him from passing the cardio component of the contested FA. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00787

    Original file (BC 2014 00787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00031

    Original file (BC 2013 00031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00031 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 8 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00091

    Original file (BC 2013 00091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her appeal the applicant submits medical documentation and a medical determination letter signed by her medical provider indicating that she did in fact have a medical condition that precluded her from passing the contested FAs. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05060

    Original file (BC 2013 05060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation dated 18 Oct 13. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00126

    Original file (BC 2014 00126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that...